Chick Flicks Defined and Discussed
Virginia and I Have had a running argument about whether or not I enjoy “Chick Flicks”. She claims that I simply don’t like them. I argue that I do, but I hold them to the same criteria for quality that I hold any other movie - they don’t get a buy simply because of their genre.
Last night, we were watching All About My Mother which I define as a chick flick (and I loved it) - Virginia disagrees. So perhaps I simply have some misconceptions about what defines a chick flick.
Throwing out a definition, I came up with “a movie describing human relationships (often romantic) from a woman’s perspective.” With this definition in mind, I came up with the following movies immediately:
Virginia disagreed with the entire list - saying that having to read the movie (subtitled) ruins the effect.
Over lunch today, Greg Lange, Edward Mao and I were talking about this. I described the plots of the above movies and they disagreed with my designation of the movies in question as chick flicks also. Stymied, I asked for a definition from Greg. He came up with:
Chick Flicks have a simple plot, and are about a woman and one or two guys.
I’ve seen some movies like this, but I’m not sure most people would describe them as chick flicks.
Just to avoid being called a foreign film snob, I came up with some American or at least English language chick flick movies:
- When Harry Met Sally
- Sleepless in Seattle
- Bridget Jones’s Diary
- My Big Fat Greek Wedding
- Whale Rider
- Four Weddings and a Funeral
- The African Queen
- Bringing Up Baby
- Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet
- Casablanca
- Lost in Translation (from Ed)
I later found a few links about the topic which triggered positive memories about the following:
- The Truth About Cats and Dogs
- Bend It Like Beckham
- Shall We Dansu? (I’m picking the original Japanese version here)
- Romeo + Juliet
- Legally Blonde
- It Could Happen To You
Also, these lists had some seriously weird choices for “chick flicks”. For example:
Hmm.
Greg came up with the following:
- Something to Talk About (Mark: Missed it - adding to Netflix)
- Romeo + Juliet (Mark: yup - I liked it too)
- Chocolat (Mark: which I couldn’t finish watching)
- You’ve Got Mail (Mark: wasn’t this an AOL commercial? Aww)
Edmo came up with:
- Love Actually (Mark: Adding to Netflix)
- Garden State (Edmo adds: “maybe, but it’s very borderline chick flick”)
- Lost In Translation (Mark: Loved it)
And the number one - suggested by Virginia is The Notebook - which I’ve got in my queue already!
So what do y’all think? I declare myself not a chick flick hater!
1 Comment »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.


The problem with many “Chick Flicks” is that they are of the same garden variety crappy Hollywood fare. Tried and true way to get the lemmings to flock to the studios. The equation is always: “Boy meets girl, boy likes girl, CONFLICT, RESOLUTION.”
Some movies that take this approach: “How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days,” “Hitch,” and even “You’ve Got Mail!” Some films can get away with it with brilliant acting with some sort of relief or drama that is not related to the core CONFLICT. Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks had enough chemistry to make “You’ve Got Mail!” to work. Other films, unfortunately, didn’t make it like that.
And “chick flicks” aren’t to be confused with “chick flixxx,” the genre you thought Greg was talking about.